April 2025

The Power of Few

How Just 18% of Brands Drive 80% of Blinkit's Sales

Platform Analysis | April 2025 Source: Blinkit Platform Data, Full Catalog Analysis
17.7%
Brands Drive 80% Sales
491 of 2,777 brands
2,777
Total Brands Listed
Massive catalog depth
8.9%
Chocolates Concentration
5 of 56 brands = 80% sales
48.9%
Bread & Pav Spread
Least concentrated category

Only 17.7% of Blinkit's brands generate 80% of the platform's revenue. Success isn't about offering the most extensive assortment — it's about identifying where demand naturally concentrates.

The Bottom Line

Despite offering a massive catalog of over 2,700 brands, Blinkit's business is heavily concentrated. Just 18% of brands account for a staggering 80% of total sales. This sharp concentration highlights a crucial reality: while customers are presented with endless choices, their spending habits remain sharply focused on a select few trusted names. Customer loyalty and trust in a few dominant brands drive the majority of sales. While expanding catalog depth can improve perceived choice, it is the strength and recall of core brands that actually fuel revenue. For emerging brands and Blinkit itself, this pattern underlines the strategic importance of high-velocity SKUs, brand equity, and focused marketing investments.

What Concentration Signals

  • Trust-Driven Purchasing: In high-stakes categories, consumers default to brands they trust—efficacy and safety trump discovery
  • Repeat Purchase Lock-In: Once consumers find working products, switching costs are high—quick commerce accelerates this lock-in
  • Brand Equity = Revenue: Core brand strength and recall fuel revenue more than catalog depth
  • High-Velocity SKUs Win: A small number of proven products drive disproportionate sales

Strategic Implications

  • For Emerging Brands: Breaking into top 18% requires sharp positioning, hero SKU focus, and significant marketing investment
  • For Dominant Brands: Defend core SKUs while innovating—don't dilute velocity across too many variants
  • For Blinkit: Balance curation with discovery—surface high-velocity products while giving visibility to quality challengers
  • Category Variation: Concentration varies wildly—Chocolates (8.9%) vs Bread (48.9%) require different strategies

The 80/20 Rule on Blinkit

Pareto Principle in Action

2,777 brands listed on Blinkit's platform across all categories.

491 brands (17.7%) generate 80% of total platform revenue.

2,286 brands (82.3%) compete for remaining 20% of sales.

The implication: Catalog depth creates perceived choice, but concentrated brand trust drives actual purchasing behavior.

Top 18% Brands (80% Sales)
Remaining 82% Brands (20% Sales)
Source: Blinkit Platform Data Analysis Get the data

Number of Brands Accounting for 80% of Sales

Category Analysis

Highest Concentration: Chocolates — only 5 brands drive 80% of category sales.

High Concentration: Jewellery (6), Audio (7), Bags/Fragrance/Deodorant (13 each) — brand trust critical.

Medium Spread: Dry Fruits (17), Gift & Kits (19), Appliances (16) — some competition.

Most Distributed: Oil (28), Bread & Pav (23) — more brands contribute meaningfully.

Total: 2,775 brands listed → Only 491 brands (18%) account for 80% of all sales.

Source: Datum Analysis, Desk Research Get the data

Brand Concentration % by Category

Concentration Analysis

Highest Concentration: Chocolates — just 8.9% of brands drive 80% of sales.

High Concentration: Appliances (17.2%), Deodorants (17.8%), Fashion (18.4%) — brand trust critical.

Medium Concentration: Gift & Kits (26.4%), Dry Fruits (27%), Oils (30.1%) — some diversity.

Lowest Concentration: Bread & Pav (48.9%) — nearly half of brands contribute meaningfully.

Lower % = Higher concentration — fewer brands dominate, harder for new entrants.

Source: Datum Analysis, Desk Research Get the data

Category Concentration Map

Category Concentration measures the minimum percentage of brands required to achieve 80% of a category's sales. Lower percentages indicate higher concentration — meaning fewer brands dominate and new entrants face steeper barriers. Higher percentages indicate more distributed sales — easier market entry but more fragmented competition.

🍫 Chocolates

Total Brands 56
Brands for 80% Sales 5
Concentration 8.9%

🔌 Appliances

Total Brands 93
Brands for 80% Sales 16
Concentration 17.2%

🧴 Deodorants

Total Brands 73
Brands for 80% Sales 13
Concentration 17.8%

👜 Fashion Accessories

Total Brands 76
Brands for 80% Sales 14
Concentration 18.4%

🎁 Gift & Kits

Total Brands 72
Brands for 80% Sales 19
Concentration 26.4%

🥜 Dry Fruits

Total Brands 63
Brands for 80% Sales 17
Concentration 27.0%

🫒 Oils

Total Brands 93
Brands for 80% Sales 28
Concentration 30.1%

🍞 Bread & Pav

Total Brands 47
Brands for 80% Sales 23
Concentration 48.9%

As quick commerce evolves, the winners will be those who master precision, not abundance.

Strategic Implications

Understanding concentration patterns across Blinkit's ecosystem

For Dominant Brands

  • Defend hero SKUs — they drive disproportionate revenue
  • Avoid portfolio fragmentation — velocity concentration wins
  • Leverage quick commerce for replenishment — build habit loops
  • Use data to identify SKU rationalization opportunities

For Emerging Brands

  • Focus on ONE hero SKU before expanding portfolio
  • Target categories with lower concentration (Bread, Oils) for easier entry
  • Avoid high-concentration categories (Chocolates) without significant differentiation
  • Invest in trial-driving mechanisms: sampling, influencers, promotions

For Quick Commerce Platforms

  • Balance curation with discovery — don't over-index on top brands
  • Create "discovery zones" for quality challengers
  • Use concentration data to optimize inventory and dark store allocation
  • Category-specific strategies: different rules for Chocolates vs Bread

Key Definitions

Pareto Principle
The 80/20 rule — roughly 80% of effects come from 20% of causes. Applied to retail: small % of brands drive large % of sales.
Brand Concentration
% of brands needed to achieve 80% of category sales. Lower = more concentrated = harder for new entrants.
High-Velocity SKU
Products with significantly higher sales turnover than category average — drive disproportionate revenue.
Catalog Depth
Total number of brands/SKUs listed on platform. Creates perceived choice but doesn't guarantee sales distribution.
Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice. The information provided should not be relied upon for making any investment or business decisions. Data reflects point-in-time estimates and may not represent current market conditions. Always conduct your own research before making strategic decisions.