← Back to Report Home
Section 06

TAM & Market Opportunity

Projections to FY30 D2C Market, E-commerce Logistics, Shipping Aggregation, Cross-Border
$92-101B
Total TAM (CY24)
₹7.7-8.4 trillion GMV
$60B
Cross-Border
MSME exports (largest segment)
40-50%
Social Commerce CAGR
Fastest growing segment
135+
Countries
ShiprocketX reach

Market Opportunity Overview

Shiprocket addresses a ₹7.7-8.4 trillion ($92-101B) TAM for new age end-to-end horizontal e-commerce enablement platforms (CY 2024). Key segments: (1) Cross-border MSME exports at ~$60B (14-20% CAGR), (2) In-store hyperlocal at $20-24B (40-45% CAGR), (3) Direct commerce at $7-9B (20-25% CAGR), (4) Other marketplaces at $4-6B (14-18% CAGR), and (5) Social commerce at $1.4-2.2B (40-50% CAGR). Large marketplaces (>$1B GMV with captive logistics) are excluded as they have built end-to-end solutions in-house.

TAM Landscape for New Age End-to-End Horizontal E-commerce Enablement Platforms

KEY INSIGHTS
Total TAM: $92-101 Billion
₹7.7-8.4 trillion GMV opportunity for new age end-to-end horizontal e-commerce enablement platforms (CY 2024)
Cross-Border = Largest Segment
MSME exports at ~$60B (CY24), growing 14-20% CAGR to $116-149B by CY29
Fastest Growing: Social Commerce
Digitally enabled social commerce at 40-50% CAGR; In-store hyperlocal at 40-45% CAGR
Large Marketplaces Excluded
Platforms with >$1B GMV or captive logistics (Amazon, Flipkart) have built end-to-end solutions in-house
TAM: $92-101 Bn
B2C Market Opportunity
GMV CY 2024, CAGR to CY2029P
$4-6 Bn
(CAGR 14-18%)
Other Marketplaces
₹332-498 Bn
$7-9 Bn
(CAGR 20-25%)
Direct Commerce
₹581-747 Bn
$20-24 Bn
(CAGR 40-45%)
In-Store Sales
₹1.7-2 Tn
$1.4-2.2 Bn
(CAGR 40-50%)
Social Commerce
₹116-183 Bn
$60 Bn
(CAGR 14-20%)
MSME Exports
₹~5 Tn
Online (Domestic Retail)
Offline (Domestic Retail)
Cross-Border
Source: Redseer Research and Analysis (DRHP) Get the data

TAM Segment Breakdown

Segment Category CY 2024 GMV CAGR to CY29 Description
Online Commerce Other Marketplaces $4-6 Bn 14-18% Marketplaces <$1B GMV without captive logistics
Direct Commerce $7-9 Bn 20-25% Brand websites needing order fulfillment, checkout, marketing
Offline Commerce In-Store Sales $20-24 Bn 40-45% Hyperlocal fulfillment using local store inventory (90-180 min delivery)
Digitally Enabled Social Commerce $1.4-2.2 Bn 40-50% WhatsApp/social media seller-to-buyer transactions
Cross-Border MSME Exports ~$60 Bn 14-20% Textiles, gems & jewelry, electronics, leather (~46% of total exports)
Total TAM $92-101 Bn ₹7.7-8.4 trillion GMV
Source: Redseer Research and Analysis (DRHP)

Market Segment Deep Dive

Online

Other Marketplaces ($4-6B)

Marketplaces with <$1B GMV without captive logistics can leverage enablement platforms to scale efficiently without heavy infrastructure investments. Focus on niche products and curated selections — complex logistics infra not always feasible.

Online

Direct Commerce ($7-9B)

Brand websites serve as primary touchpoint for customer engagement, differentiation and direct feedback. Managing end-to-end operations (fulfillment, checkout, marketing, post-sales) is complex — enablement platforms provide a one-stop solution.

Offline

In-Store / Hyperlocal ($20-24B)

Hyperlocal fulfillment using local store inventory for quick last-mile deliveries (90-180 minutes). Platforms help MSMEs overcome resource constraints with digital order management and optimized delivery solutions.

Social

Social Commerce ($1.4-2.2B)

Direct seller-to-buyer interactions via WhatsApp and social media. While many orders from neighborhood communities are fulfilled manually, sellers reaching broader audiences rely on enablement platforms for shipping and fulfillment.

Large Marketplaces Excluded from TAM

Marketplaces with >$1B GMV or with captive/affiliate logistics partners (Amazon, Flipkart) have built end-to-end solutions for merchants selling on their platforms. They partner directly with LSPs or have their own logistics partners — hence not considered part of the addressable market for horizontal enablement platforms.

Illustrative GMV for New Age End-to-End Horizontal E-commerce Enablement Platforms

GROWTH PROJECTIONS
23-29% CAGR (CY24→CY29)
TAM growing from $92-101B to $256-361B over 5 years
CY29P: $256-361 Billion
₹22-30 trillion GMV projected by CY2029
In-Store Sales: 3x Growth
$20-24B → $108-154B (largest absolute growth)
Cross-Border: $116-149B
MSME exports nearly doubling by CY29
Note: Conversion rate: 1 US$ = ₹83
Source: Redseer Research and Analysis (DRHP) Get the data

Retailer Archetypes - Service Needs by Segment

KEY INSIGHTS
Traditional Brands (>₹2,500 Mn)
Offline-first brands with omnichannel presence; need fast, efficient logistics tools integrable across channels
New Age D2C (>₹2,500 Mn)
Online-first brands with >50% sales online; need seamless coordination with premium customer experience
SMEs (₹50-2,500 Mn)
Branded & unbranded retailers in Tier 2+ cities; need easy digital integration with affordable solutions
Micro Enterprises (<₹50 Mn)
Solopreneurs on social media; need easy tech setup, low-cost shipping, ready-to-use templates
Need for service: Low Medium High
Traditional New Age Medium, Small & Micro Enterprises
SMEs Micro
Revenue (INR Mn) >2,500 >2,500 50-2,500 <50
Online Integration
Customer Acquisition
Conversion Tools
Order Fulfilment
Post Sales Tools
Source: Redseer Research and Analysis Get the data

E-commerce Service Providers Landscape

KEY INSIGHTS
Shiprocket = Top Right Quadrant
Horizontal end-to-end enablement platform — open platform with full breadth of services
Plug-and-Play Infrastructure
Best-in-class service providers across logistics, payments, marketing & fulfillment
vs Vertical Providers
Single-function solutions require MSMEs to stitch together multiple vendors — inefficient & costly
vs Marketplaces
Despite end-to-end services, marketplaces restrict brands from selecting specific solutions
Breadth of Services
End-to-End Platform
Vertical solution
System Design
Closed
Open Platform
Marketplaces
Horizontal End to End
Enablement Platforms
(Shiprocket)
Vertical
Service Providers
Vertical
Enablement Platforms
Source: Redseer Research and Analysis Get the data

Why Horizontal End-to-End Enablement Wins

Horizontal end-to-end e-commerce enablement platforms provide MSMEs with a plug-and-play infrastructure by integrating best-in-class service providers across logistics, payments, marketing, and fulfillment. They offer flexibility, integration, and cost efficiency — allowing MSMEs to scale efficiently while maintaining full control over their operations.

Platform Type Pros Cons Example
Horizontal E2E Enablement Seamless end-to-end stack, flexibility to choose solutions, full control Requires tech-savviness to maximize value Shiprocket
Marketplaces End-to-end services, built-in traffic Restricts brand choice, no customer data ownership Amazon, Flipkart
Vertical Enablement Deep expertise in specific function Single-function; MSMEs must stitch multiple vendors Razorpay (payments)
Vertical Service Providers Specialized solutions Multiple vendor management, higher costs, inefficiencies Individual logistics cos
Source: Redseer Research and Analysis Get the data

Services Landscape — Enabling Online Retail

SERVICE CATEGORIES
Order Fulfilment
Inventory management, transport services, warehousing — backbone of logistics operations
Supporting Services
Checkout payments, CRM, data analytics, marketing, customer conversion
Up to 20% Take Rate
Enablement platforms can capture up to 20% of enabled GMV through bundled services
Land & Expand Model
Merchants gradually expand service adoption as they scale, deepening platform integration
Enabling Online Retail
Order Fulfilment
Inventory Management
Transport Services
Warehousing
Supporting Services
Pre-Sales
Post-Sales
Detailed Service Breakdown
Order Fulfilment Services:
  • Inventory & Order Management
  • Transport / Shipping Services
  • Warehousing & Fulfillment
  • Returns Management
Supporting Services:
  • Checkout & Payments
  • Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
  • Data Analytics & Marketing
  • Financing & Working Capital
  • Pre-checkout & Post-checkout Services
Source: Redseer Research and Analysis (DRHP)

Platform Take Rate & Revenue Model

New age end-to-end horizontal e-commerce enablement platforms can capture a take rate of up to 20% of enabled GMV, driven by adoption of core and supporting services essential for streamlining e-commerce operations.

Core Services
Backbone of Engagement
  • Fulfilment & Shipping
  • Returns Management
  • Seamless Logistics
Supporting Services
Incremental Revenue
  • Financing & Payments
  • Customer Service & CRM
  • Pre/Post-checkout Services

Land & Expand Revenue Model

For merchants utilizing a comprehensive suite of services, the take rate is closer to the upper bound (~20%). For those initially leveraging only select solutions, the take rate is lower. As businesses scale, increasing operational complexities necessitate greater reliance on bundled service offerings, leading to higher platform engagement over time. This progression reinforces the enablement model, wherein merchants gradually expand their service adoption, deepening integration with the platform.

Source: Redseer Research and Analysis (DRHP)

TAM Summary & Opportunity Sizing

Shiprocket addresses multiple large, growing markets. The combined TAM across D2C enablement, e-commerce logistics, quick commerce, and cross-border represents a $150B+ opportunity by FY30.

Market Opportunity Matrix

Segment Current Size FY30 Projected CAGR Shiprocket Position
D2C Market $100B $250B+ 25% #1 D2C Enabler
E-com Logistics $7-8B $15-20B 20% #1 Aggregator
Quick Commerce ₹0.5T ₹4-6T 50%+ Zomato Synergy
Cross-Border $2-3B $10B+ 30% ShiprocketX (135 countries)

Serviceable Addressable Market (SAM)

While TAM represents total market opportunity, Shiprocket's SAM focuses on: (1) D2C/SMB merchants (not marketplace sellers), (2) Domestic India shipping (primary) + cross-border, (3) Tech-enabled merchants comfortable with SaaS platforms. Conservative SAM estimate: $20-30B by FY30, implying significant runway for growth.

TAM Visualization

Source: Industry Reports, Redseer, IBEF Get the data
India Macro Management & Governance
Disclaimer: This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, trading advice, or any other sort of advice. The information provided should not be relied upon for making any investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Always conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.